More Protection for Whistleblowers
Publication Name: Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Journal
Publication Date: 14-Feb-2012
Publication Link: Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Journal
Primary TELG Authors: R. Scott Oswald
2011 marked a sea change for whistleblowers at the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB). The ARB changed the standard of proving protected activity, embraced the concept of corporate knowledge, established the most generous standard for an adverse action in employment law, and established the fact that most Sarbanes-Oxley cases should proceed to an evidentiary hearing.
In Sylvester, the ARB loosened the test for analyzing protected activity, specifically rejecting the test set forth in Platone v. FLYi, Inc. In Platone, the Board held that in order to constitute protected conduct, a complainant’s protected communications “must relate ‘definitively and specifically’ to the subject matter of the particular statute under which protection is afforded.” The Board noted that the use of the words “definitively and specifically” in whistleblower cases came from cases discussing the Energy Reorganization Act…
“More Protection for Whistleblowers.” Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Journal (April 25, 2012)
